<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Illegal Music Dowloading: Look At The Facts</title> <atom:link href="http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/</link> <description>A website for technology information and assistance</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:42:32 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: larissa</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-34430</link> <dc:creator>larissa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:50:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-34430</guid> <description>i agree.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-34429</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:07:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-34429</guid> <description>cause its illegal</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cause its illegal</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: D.W.</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-34384</link> <dc:creator>D.W.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:14:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-34384</guid> <description>Why don&#039;t they sue the likes of Clear Channel?  It is their fault that today&#039;s music is so wimpy--radio stations are no longer free to play whatever the local market will bear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can remember times past, before 1996.  Radio stations would get requests from the people, and would play the requested songs.  If the songs were good enough, people in nearby cities would hear those songs and start hounding their own stations to play them, and so on.  Eventually, the label would pick up on it, and release the single.  Before long, the song is a national hit.  It didn&#039;t matter whether it was country, rock, adult contemporary, soul, disco, or what--if it was good enough, it was requested and played on the radio.  And people would then go out and buy the record.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These days, with a few companies owning all the radio stations, if people request a song, they need to seek permission from the station to play it.  Usually, unless they get paid enough, they will deny permission.  The song stays in the dark, with no way of being singled out from the filler songs.  Good talent is not promoted, and the records are never produced.  What good music there is out there is not promoted, since requests are no longer honored on radio stations.  And, people do not buy those albums.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The suit should go after these big companies and force them to allow DJs to take local requests.  That would allow these songs to be exposed to more people.  Today, the only way many people even hear the songs at all is by &quot;stealing&quot; them.  Since today&#039;s radio refuses to play them, services like LimeWire have stepped up to fill in the gap.  People will steal one song, and if they like it enough, they will buy it (there is never a guarantee that they are getting the full version on these P2P services).  If they do not, they will do what they did with the radio:  delete the file and forget about the song.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s get rid of the whole pay-for-play system, the &quot;indies&quot;, radio stations that are owned by one or two people, and limited playlists.  Let&#039;s return to the days when radio DJs were free to play whatever they wanted.  This situation, not &quot;stolen&quot; songs, is the real culprit in declining music sales.  If people hear of good songs, they are going to buy them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, people should use the honor system--if they steal a song and don&#039;t buy it, that is a disincentive for artists to continue putting out good music.  If you like the song, support the artist and buy the album.  In the meantime, return to good radio stations will help by allowing good songs to be played there--and the advertisements will help support the artists.  Which would in turn encourage new artists to put out additional good music.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#39;t they sue the likes of Clear Channel?  It is their fault that today&#39;s music is so wimpy&#8211;radio stations are no longer free to play whatever the local market will bear.</p><p>I can remember times past, before 1996.  Radio stations would get requests from the people, and would play the requested songs.  If the songs were good enough, people in nearby cities would hear those songs and start hounding their own stations to play them, and so on.  Eventually, the label would pick up on it, and release the single.  Before long, the song is a national hit.  It didn&#39;t matter whether it was country, rock, adult contemporary, soul, disco, or what&#8211;if it was good enough, it was requested and played on the radio.  And people would then go out and buy the record.</p><p>These days, with a few companies owning all the radio stations, if people request a song, they need to seek permission from the station to play it.  Usually, unless they get paid enough, they will deny permission.  The song stays in the dark, with no way of being singled out from the filler songs.  Good talent is not promoted, and the records are never produced.  What good music there is out there is not promoted, since requests are no longer honored on radio stations.  And, people do not buy those albums.</p><p>The suit should go after these big companies and force them to allow DJs to take local requests.  That would allow these songs to be exposed to more people.  Today, the only way many people even hear the songs at all is by &#8220;stealing&#8221; them.  Since today&#39;s radio refuses to play them, services like LimeWire have stepped up to fill in the gap.  People will steal one song, and if they like it enough, they will buy it (there is never a guarantee that they are getting the full version on these P2P services).  If they do not, they will do what they did with the radio:  delete the file and forget about the song.</p><p>Let&#39;s get rid of the whole pay-for-play system, the &#8220;indies&#8221;, radio stations that are owned by one or two people, and limited playlists.  Let&#39;s return to the days when radio DJs were free to play whatever they wanted.  This situation, not &#8220;stolen&#8221; songs, is the real culprit in declining music sales.  If people hear of good songs, they are going to buy them.</p><p>Also, people should use the honor system&#8211;if they steal a song and don&#39;t buy it, that is a disincentive for artists to continue putting out good music.  If you like the song, support the artist and buy the album.  In the meantime, return to good radio stations will help by allowing good songs to be played there&#8211;and the advertisements will help support the artists.  Which would in turn encourage new artists to put out additional good music.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mrcoolcm</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-34268</link> <dc:creator>mrcoolcm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:36:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-34268</guid> <description>You pay for Napster, it&#039;s not file sharing, they sell napster cards just like itunes cards.  They lisenc their music also, it&#039;s not like limewire.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pay for Napster, it&#39;s not file sharing, they sell napster cards just like itunes cards.  They lisenc their music also, it&#39;s not like limewire.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cody (Cballa)</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-34228</link> <dc:creator>Cody (Cballa)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:09:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-34228</guid> <description>If iTunes can tag all of the songs you buy and not allow you to save backups, what keeps them from purposely bugging there software so you have to re-buy all new songs again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If iTunes can tag all of the songs you buy and not allow you to save backups, what keeps them from purposely bugging there software so you have to re-buy all new songs again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff Weisbein</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-32038</link> <dc:creator>Jeff Weisbein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-32038</guid> <description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-32037&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Daniel&lt;/a&gt;: Yes they did!  I&#039;m very pleased about that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a
href="#comment-32037" rel="nofollow">Daniel</a>: Yes they did!  I&#8217;m very pleased about that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-32037</link> <dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-32037</guid> <description>Just to let you know, in January 2009, Apple removed the DRM management from most of it&#039;s songs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know, in January 2009, Apple removed the DRM management from most of it&#8217;s songs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: b. lee</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-31706</link> <dc:creator>b. lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:16:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-31706</guid> <description>okay while i get the fact that it is fun to download music for free you are also making fools out of the music industries. they pay thousands to have their artists songs made into a cd and as soon as they come out you put it on limewire and then you see that cd go down in value. it is just a stupid idea to down load it when you can spend like 9 dollars on a cd at walmart.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay while i get the fact that it is fun to download music for free you are also making fools out of the music industries. they pay thousands to have their artists songs made into a cd and as soon as they come out you put it on limewire and then you see that cd go down in value. it is just a stupid idea to down load it when you can spend like 9 dollars on a cd at walmart.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: liliana</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-31705</link> <dc:creator>liliana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-31705</guid> <description>the piracy doing is bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the piracy doing is bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: billy</title><link>http://www.besttechie.net/2008/04/14/illegal-music-dowloading-look-at-the-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-31704</link> <dc:creator>billy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:47:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.besttechie.net/?p=159#comment-31704</guid> <description>omg for real y would they do that i just dont get it no like its just plain stupid and for real i just think illegal music is bad for real omg im just not even joking downloading illegal music is horrible i just dont get it when u could help artists out by just paying a dollar instead of stealing their money because of illegal downloading of music</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg for real y would they do that i just dont get it no like its just plain stupid and for real i just think illegal music is bad for real omg im just not even joking downloading illegal music is horrible i just dont get it when u could help artists out by just paying a dollar instead of stealing their money because of illegal downloading of music</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.besttechie.net

Served from: 161-229-adsl.psiatera.com @ 2010-03-11 12:09:26 -->