10 Reasons To Buy An iPad
January 29, 2010 – 9:20 AM | Comments

Not sure whether you want to buy an iPad?  On the fence about it?  You are not alone.  Even with the slight disappointment, I decided that I will in fact be purchasing one.  The only …

Read the full story »
Geek

Read about the latest geek trends, news, and gadgets right here!

Malware Report

Learn about the latest threats online, how to remove them, and even how to prevent them.

Software

Find all the latest and greatest software out there for Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Twitter

Keep up with the latest from one of the web’s hottest sites (twitter.com).

Video

Never miss another of my videos again – view the latest videos from live.besttechie.net!

RSS FeedEmail SubscriptionsTwitterYouTubeFacebook
Share

Home » Apple
    Share/Bookmark

Apple Is Definitely A Hardware Company

Submitted by Jeff Weisbein on June 20, 2009 – 3:20 PMComments
Apple Is Definitely A Hardware Company

I just read two separate articles (one, two) claiming that Apple is (or is turning into) a software company.  I have to disagree with that statement.  I recently wrote about the price war between Windows 7 and Snow Leopard that will be going on in the not too distant future where I pointed out that Microsoft (a true software company) simply cannot compete with Apple on price when it comes to software.

Apple will be charging $29 to upgrade to Snow Leopard from Leopard (for existing Leopard users) which is much less than it cost it upgrade from Tiger to Leopard ($129).  If Apple was truly a software company there would be no way they could charge so little for the product.  Apple generates most of its revenues through its hardware – not its software (or others software).  The fact of the matter is Microsoft cannot do that. While Microsoft is attempting to lower the price during the pre-sale of Windows 7, I do not expect that price to last.

The second article also mentions rumors and speculation of a Mac App Store (a desktop version of the iPhone App Store) which may seem like a good idea on paper, but not in reality. Why would a desktop developer want to sell his program for $25 and only receive a portion of it? Whereas, the same developer could sell it on his own site and make the full $25. If you’re looking at the exposure question, well, I would assume the Mac App Store would be double (if not more) the size of the iPhone App Store and we all know how hard it is to catch a break in that App Store.

Apple is not a software company.  They are a hardware company with their own operating system.  If Dell were to come out with an operating system which they put on their computers and mobile devices would you call them a software company?  Of course not.  Dell’s revenues would still come mostly from their hardware sales (desktops, laptops, mobile devices, etc).  This is the exact case with Apple.

Related Products:

Apple MacBook MC207LL/A 13.3-Inch Laptop
Apple MacBook Pro MB991LL/A 13.3-Inch Laptop
Apple MacBook Pro MB990LL/A 13.3-Inch Laptop
Apple iMac MB950LL/A 21.5-Inch Desktop
Apple MacBook Pro MC118LL/A 15.4-Inch Laptop

You might also like:

Price War: Snow Leopard vs Windows 7

Apple vs OEM – Follow Up to Mac to PC Switch

Steve Jobs Responds to The Little App Factory: “Change Your Apps Name”

Does The iPhone 3GS Battery Suck?

Tags: , , ,

  • I personally think they're both, equally. Just because they make the pricing of Snow Leopard low, doesn't mean they're only a hardware company. If they were just hardware, we'd have Mac's running Windows/Linux/Unix, but not OSX. Without OSX, Apple couldn't have made the iPhone into the success it is today, especially with all the free developer tools made available for free. If you also take into consideration that they also make iWork, iLife, Aperture, Final Cut Pro/Studio, Logic Express, along with all the Safari/iChat/Mail to make their hardware a fantastic experience, I think it's fair to say that the ponder in both markets.

    Snow Leopard doesn't seem to be a big upgrade (except from performance features) from Leopard, so I don't really see no point in charging a big fee.

    Just my £0.02 ;)
  • Matt Hodges
    I'm not so convinced. I think that they are definitely both. Just look at how much software they do produce--in addition to being a hardware company. Look at the software that Apple produces, for free or for a hefty cost:

    - Final Cut
    - Logic
    - iLife
    - iWork
    - MobileMe
    - Safari
    - Quicktime
    - Aperture
    - Remote Desktop
    - Shake
blog comments powered by Disqus